lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 01:28:06 +0100 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com> To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>, Michael Brown <mcb30@...e.org>, Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...il.com>, Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>, qiuxishi@...wei.com, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, "xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>, joro@...tes.org, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, aryabinin@...tuozzo.com, Michael Matz <matz@...e.de>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>, andreyknvl@...gle.com, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@...il.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>, long.wanglong@...wei.com Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v1 0/8] x86/init: Linux linker tables On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 03:56:35PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 01/21/16 14:25, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > > <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote: > >>> Sure, do we know if that ICC compatible? Do we care? There are a > >>> series of ICC hacks put in place on ipxe's original solution which > >>> I've folded in, it seems that works but if we care about ICC those > >>> folks should perhaps help review as well. > >> > >> I didn't know the kernel could even be compiled with ICC? Thought > >> only GCC worked? > > > > I'm happy with that, just wanted to make sure I raise the flag concern > > given the icc hacks on the linker tables. > > > >> Anyhow - it may be that those fixes were for quite old ICC versions. > >> Does the latest one manifest these oddities? > > > > I am not sure, I yield to Michael as the author of the original ICC > > compatibility pieces. If we don't care about ICC let me know and I'll > > just drop the stuff. In lack of such statements I'll just keep the > > work arounds in place, but I'm more than trilled to drop it. > > > > In general we let the ICC and Clang/LLVM teams communicate with out a > post facto. We can't just guess what their requirements are, especially > since they are likely to change between revisions. Great. I'm going to drop ICC hacks. Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists