lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:44:56 -0800
From:	Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>
To:	mika.penttila@...tfour.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, rientjes@...gle.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] arm64: let set_memory_xx(addr, 0) succeed.

On 01/23/2016 07:05 AM, mika.penttila@...tfour.com wrote:
> From: Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...tfour.com>
>
> This makes set_memory_xx() consistent with x86.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Penttilä mika.penttila@...tfour.com
>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c | 3 +++
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
> index 3571c73..52220dd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
> @@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ static int change_memory_common(unsigned long addr, int numpages,
>   		WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
>   	}
>
> +	if (!numpages)
> +		return 0;
> +
>   	if (start < MODULES_VADDR || start >= MODULES_END)
>   		return -EINVAL;
>
>

I think this is going to conflict with Ard's patch
lkml.kernel.org/g/<1453125665-26627-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>

Can you rebase on top of that?

Thanks,
Laura

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ