lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 26 Jan 2016 12:57:50 +0900
From:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
	linux-block@...r.kernel.org, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [4.5.0-rc1/-next] unaligned bio-s

Hello,

On (01/25/16 19:45), Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 01/25/2016 06:49 PM, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> >Hello,
> >
> >With 4.5.0-rc1/linux-next I see unaligned requests passed to zram block
> >device.
> >
> >bio->bi_iter.bi_size is expected to be ZRAM_LOGICAL_BLOCK_SIZE (1 << 12) aligned.
> 
> This is current in my for-linus, if you pull in:
> 
> git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block.git for-linus
> 
> and re-test. It'll go into mainline soon.


Works for me, thanks!


FWIW,
Tested-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>

	-ss

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ