linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] perf hists browser: Check script context menu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Jan 2016 22:12:47 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] perf hists browser: Check script context menu

Hi Arnaldo,

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 03:36:53PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 03:35:43PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:31:42PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > > The script and data-switch context menu are only meaningful when it
> > > deals with a data file.  So add a check so that it cannot be shown when
> > > perf-top is run.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> > > ---
> > >  tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c | 12 +++++++-----
> > >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c b/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c
> > > index 05e94feba3cb..0affffeed89c 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c
> > > @@ -2309,7 +2309,7 @@ skip_annotation:
> > >  						     socked_id);
> > >  		}
> > >  		/* perf script support */
> > 
> > I instead used:
> > 
> > 		if (is_report_browser(hbt)
> 
> Oops, that should be:
> 
> 		if (!is_report_browser(hbt)
> 
> > 			goto skip_scripting;

Oh, it looks better! :)


> > 
> > > -		if (browser->he_selection) {
> > 			
> > 
> > > +		if (is_report_browser(hbt) && browser->he_selection) {
> > >  			if (sort__has_thread) {
> > >  				nr_options += add_script_opt(browser,
> > >  							     &actions[nr_options],
> > > @@ -2332,10 +2332,12 @@ skip_annotation:
> > >  							     NULL, browser->selection->sym);
> > >  			}
> > >  		}
> > > -		nr_options += add_script_opt(browser, &actions[nr_options],
> > > -					     &options[nr_options], NULL, NULL);
> > > -		nr_options += add_switch_opt(browser, &actions[nr_options],
> > > -					     &options[nr_options]);
> > > +		if (is_report_browser(hbt)) {
> > > +			nr_options += add_script_opt(browser, &actions[nr_options],
> > > +						     &options[nr_options], NULL, NULL);
> > > +			nr_options += add_switch_opt(browser, &actions[nr_options],
> > > +						     &options[nr_options]);
> > > +		}
> > 
> > skip_scripting:
> > 
> > >  		nr_options += add_exit_opt(browser, &actions[nr_options],
> > >  					   &options[nr_options]);
> > >  
> > 
> > Also the other patches in this series were already done in my tree,
> > carved out from your initial patch but instead checking things at
> > add_foo_opt() in most cases,

Looks good!

Thanks for your work,
Namhyung