linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] rtc: max77686: Use dev_warn() instead of pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 27 Jan 2016 11:35:54 +0900
From:	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...sung.com>
To:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Cc:	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] rtc: max77686: Use dev_warn() instead of pr_warn()

> > On 01/26/2016 10:22 PM, Andi Shyti wrote:
> >> Hi Javier,
> >>
> >>>           if (tm->tm_year < 100) {
> >>> -            pr_warn("RTC can't handle year %d. Assume it's 2000.\n",
> >>> -                1900 + tm->tm_year);
> >>> +            dev_warn(info->dev,
> >>> +                 "RTC can't handle year %d. Assume it's 2000\n",
> >>> +                 1900 + tm->tm_year);
> >>>               return -EINVAL;
> >>
> >> Because we are returning an error value, why not use dev_err()?
> >>
> > 
> > You are absolutely right. Since the driver was using pr_warn(), I used
> > dev_warn() but dev_err() would had been correct.
> 
> Wait. The message says that "2000 will be assumed" which is not an
> error. The message indicates that driver will proceed, thus the warning.
> 
> However the driver won't proceed because the max77686_rtc_set_time()
> will abort. This came from max8997 which has the same issue.
> 
> This means that either message should be changed (dev_err() without the
> "assume" verb) or the function should not abort and set the year to
> 2000+something (then dev_warn()... look at rtc-ds3234.c and rtc-mcp795.c).
> 
> The easiest would be to choose #1 - no changes in the logic.

Nevertheless, the function fails, and those who call
max77686_rtc_tm_to_data() fail as well, so, we are printing
warning, but behaving as error.

Either we print error and return error, or we print warning, we
set:

tm->tm_year = 100; /* don't know if I got the logic right */

and return 0

Right?

Thanks,
Andi