linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] mm/madvise: update comment on sys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 Jan 2016 05:50:56 +0000
From:	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
To:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
CC:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
	"Jason Baron" <jbaron@...hat.com>,
	Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm/madvise: update comment on sys_madvise()

On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 04:28:35PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 27-01-16 10:24:25, Naoya Horiguchi wrote:
> > Some new MADV_* advices are not documented in sys_madvise() comment.
> > So let's update it.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
> 
> Other than few suggestions below
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> 
> > ---
> >  mm/madvise.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git v4.4-mmotm-2016-01-20-16-10/mm/madvise.c v4.4-mmotm-2016-01-20-16-10_patched/mm/madvise.c
> > index 6a77114..c897b15 100644
> > --- v4.4-mmotm-2016-01-20-16-10/mm/madvise.c
> > +++ v4.4-mmotm-2016-01-20-16-10_patched/mm/madvise.c
> > @@ -639,14 +639,26 @@ madvise_behavior_valid(int behavior)
> >   *		some pages ahead.
> >   *  MADV_DONTNEED - the application is finished with the given range,
> >   *		so the kernel can free resources associated with it.
> > + *  MADV_FREE - the application marks pages in the given range as lasyfree,
> 
> s@...yfree@...y free@
> 
> > + *		where actual purges are postponed until memory pressure happens.
> >   *  MADV_REMOVE - the application wants to free up the given range of
> >   *		pages and associated backing store.
> >   *  MADV_DONTFORK - omit this area from child's address space when forking:
> >   *		typically, to avoid COWing pages pinned by get_user_pages().
> >   *  MADV_DOFORK - cancel MADV_DONTFORK: no longer omit this area when forking.
> > + *  MADV_HWPOISON - trigger memory error handler as if the given memory range
> > + *		were corrupted by unrecoverable hardware memory failure.
> > + *  MADV_SOFT_OFFLINE - try to soft-offline the given range of memory.
> >   *  MADV_MERGEABLE - the application recommends that KSM try to merge pages in
> >   *		this area with pages of identical content from other such areas.
> >   *  MADV_UNMERGEABLE- cancel MADV_MERGEABLE: no longer merge pages with others.
> > + *  MADV_HUGEPAGE - the application wants to allocate transparent hugepages to
> > + *		load the content of the given memory range.
> 
> I guess that a slightly different wording would be better:
> 
> application wants to back the given range by transparent huge pages in
> the future. Existing pages might be coalesced and new pages might be
> allocated as THP.
> 
> > + *  MADV_NOHUGEPAGE - cancel MADV_HUGEPAGE: no longer allocate transparent
> > + *		hugepages.
> 
> Mark the given range as not worth being backed by transparent huge pages
> so neither existing pages will be coalesced into THP nor new pages will
> be allocated as THP.

Thank you for the elaboration.
I'm fine for all these change.

- Naoya