linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] intel_th: the number of masters should be (sw_end

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 Jan 2016 18:55:34 +0800
From:	Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@...aro.org>
To:	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] intel_th: the number of masters should be (sw_end
 - sw_start + 1)

On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Alexander Shishkin
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> Chunyan Zhang <zhang.chunyan@...aro.org> writes:
>
>> Hi Alex,
>
> Hi chunyan,
>
>> Is there any problem on this patch, I noticed that you lost this patch
>> when you sent a patchset to Greg for 4.4 merge.
>
> No, there isn't, it just doesn't fix anything important to be sent
> outside of merge window, but the other one does. I'll queue this one up
> for the next merge window.
>
> Well, actually, one thing, since you brought it up: can you fix the
> commit message to be more in line with commit message guidelines? There

Sure, I'll do.

Thanks,
Chunyan

> are many articles/blog posts on the internet that explain what and why
> should be mentioned in a commit message.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Alex