linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/11] sync framework de-staging: part 1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 29 Jan 2016 08:10:10 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	Daniel Stone <daniels@...labora.com>,
	Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
	Riley Andrews <riandrews@...roid.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
	Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
	Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
	John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@...el.com>,
	Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] sync framework de-staging: part 1 - clean up

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:47:20PM -0200, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 2016-01-25 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>:
> 
> > Hey,
> > 
> > Op 21-01-16 om 13:49 schreef Gustavo Padovan:
> > > From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.co.uk>
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The following patches are some clean ups on the sync framework before
> > > we start the actual de-staging. The main changes here are the move of
> > > SW_SYNC_USER to debugfs. Removal of struct sync_pt in favor of direct
> > > use of struct fence. And the rename of sync_fence to sync_file, a name
> > > to better reflect what it is for, a struct that connects struct fence(s)
> > > to a file.
> > >
> > > Please review. Thanks.
> > >
> > > Gustavo Padovan (11):
> > >   staging/android: fix sync framework documentation
> > >   staging/android: sync: remove interfaces that are not used
> > >   staging/android: remove not used sync_timeline ops
> > >   staging/android: create a 'sync' dir for debugfs information
> > >   staging/android: move SW_SYNC_USER to a debugfs file
> > >   staging/android: rename sync_fence to sync_file
> > >   staging/android: rename 'sync_pt' to 'fence' in struct sync_fence_cb
> > >   staging/android: remove struct sync_pt
> > >   staging/android: remove unused var from sync_timeline_signal()
> > >   staging/android: remove pointless sync_timeline_signal at destroy
> > >     phase
> > >   staging/android: remove sync_fence_create_dma()
> > >
> > For whole series:
> > Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>
> > 
> > Renaming sync_fence to sync_file makes sense, it should hopefully reduce confusion.
> 
> Poke. What is missing for this to go upstream? Do I need more review
> here? Thanks.

You just sent this, give me a chance to get to it, my staging patch
queue is over 1000 patches at the moment :(

greg k-h