linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET 00/10] perf tools: Apply percent-limit to callchains (v2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 30 Jan 2016 22:52:29 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET 00/10] perf tools: Apply percent-limit to callchains (v2)

Hi Arnaldo,

On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 6:00 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...nel.org> wrote:
> Em Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 08:52:25PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 09:24:54PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>
>> SNIP
>>
>> > > > > The default limit of hist entries is 0 so it basically shows all
>> > > > > entries.  But default callchain limit is 0.5% so hist entries under
>> > > > > 0.5% won't show callchains.
>> > > >
>> > > > Btw, I changed it to 0.005% in this patchset.  Did you apply all the
>> > > > patches and run 'perf report' with default value?
>> > >
>> > > yep, I had it and then reverted ;-) but I made typo
>> > > in the previous email.. what I meant was:
>> > >
>> > > also I see extra LINE for entries...  ;-)
>> >
>> > Ah, so you meant the blank lines..  The fix would be like following
>>
>> yep, tested.. works ;-)
>
> Namhyung, can I try to process this patchkit just by reading these
> commends and making the adjustments? Or is there something outstanding
> that warrants you to push a v2?

It'd great for me if you process this (v1).  I cannot work on the v2
for a couple of days..

Thanks,
Namhyung