lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 1 Feb 2016 11:11:42 +0900
From:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:	"Li, Weigang" <weigang.li@...el.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org>,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] crypto/compress: add asynchronous compression
 support

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 06:09:01PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:19:42PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >
> > I have tested asynchronous compression APIs in zram and I saw
> > regression. Atomic allocation and setting up SG lists are culprit
> > for this regression. Moreover, zram optimizes linearisation
> 
> So which is it, atomic allocations or setting up SG lists? There
> is nothing in acomp that requires you to do an atomic allocation.

Atomic allocation are called for linearisation when needed. Zram's
compressed content is usually stored in two physically separate pages
so linearisation is needed. See scomp_map().

Setting up SG lists means that to use acomp, sg_init_table(),
sg_set_page() are need to be called by zram unlike the case just
passing the pointer based buffer.

Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ