lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:30:38 +1100 From: Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com> To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: fix memory leak Hi Sudip, On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:25 PM, Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 11:03:35AM +1100, Julian Calaby wrote: >> Hi Sudip, >> >> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Sudip Mukherjee >> <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com> wrote: >> > On error we jumped to the error label and returned the error code but we >> > missed releasing sinfo. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@...torindia.org> >> >> Should the From: and Signed-off-by: email addresses be the same? > > I think 2 years back I had a long discussion with Greg about this and > since then I al submitting patches like this. A small summayg of the > problem from that discussion: > > "we have strict DMARC check for the corporate mail server. DMARC = > domain based message authentication. > So the mail i sent reached all the list subscriber from a different > server than our designated server, and as a result it is marked as spam > in many places and I have already received a few complaints regarding > that." Ok, fair enough then. Thanks, -- Julian Calaby Email: julian.calaby@...il.com Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists