lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 05 Feb 2016 10:36:20 +0900
From:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To:	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc:	olof@...om.net, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	arnd@...db.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: defconfig: Enable samsung MFD and related configs

On 04.02.2016 13:02, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> On 11/06/2015 10:07 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 02:47:12PM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> 2015-11-06 14:27 GMT+09:00 Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>:
>>>> Exynos7 based espresso board uses S2MPS15, a multifunction device.
>>>> This patch enables S2MPS1X regulator, pmic-clk and rtc drivers
>>>> utilized by
>>>> the same.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changes since v1:
>>>> * updated the comment message to describe which platfrom uses it.
>>>> * enable COMMON_CLK_S2MPS11 which is needed to enable pmic-clk block.
>>>>
>>>>   arch/arm64/configs/defconfig |    4 ++++
>>>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
>>>
>>> Catalin,
>>>
>>> Are you usually taking such arm64 defconfig changes or should they go
>>> through arm-soc?
>>
>> Usually arm-soc but I don't mind either way.
>>
> Looks like this patch is not merged...because of this 4.5-rc1 on
> exynos7-esspreso does not boot to user space.
> Do I need to resend this patch?

Yes, please resend.
I reviewed it on the list archives (from different email) but for
applying I need to get the patch delivered to my mail box. Unfortunately
you didn't put Samsung SoC guys on recipients list and at the same time
patchwork does not work in company network.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ