linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: governor: Simplify cpufreq_governor

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 7 Feb 2016 21:10:24 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
	Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>,
	Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: governor: Simplify cpufreq_governor_limits()

On 07-02-16, 16:23, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> 
> Use the observation that cpufreq_governor_limits() doesn't have to
> get to the policy object it wants to manipulate by walking the
> reference chain cdbs->policy_dbs->policy, as the final pointer is
> actually equal to its argument, and make it access the policy
> object directy via its argument.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c |   17 ++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Why the hell did we write it that way earlier ? :)

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>

-- 
viresh