linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Fix broken DMAFLUSHP on Rockchips platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 08 Feb 2016 23:21:57 +0100
From:	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
To:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Cc:	Caesar Wang <caesar.upstream@...il.com>,
	Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shawn.lin@...k-chips.com,
	dianders@...omium.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Fix broken DMAFLUSHP on Rockchips platform

Hi Vinod,

Am Montag, 8. Februar 2016, 18:44:19 schrieb Vinod Koul:
> On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:27:04AM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> > Am Montag, 8. Februar 2016, 08:41:34 schrieb Vinod Koul:
> > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 02:56:54PM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote:
> > > > Hello Vinod,
> > > > 
> > > > Is there any chance apply the DMA patches?:-)
> > > 
> > > I was waiting for any ACKs on ARM patches before I merge this series.
> > 
> > I think the more regular way is for the driver maintainer to take the
> > driver-specific stuff and the devicetree parts going through the
> > specific arm- tree. But if you really want to take the whole series,
> > for patches 4,5,6
> Yes but that causes cross tree dependencies, which looking at this won't
> be a big problem, so I can safely merge dmaengine changes and rest can go
> thru ARM tree.
> 
> Typically submitter should say which tree he/she prefers, which was not
> provided..
> 
> So, are all okay to merge the entire series thru dmaengine tree or
> independent. I don't mind either

In general I don't mind either solution, but would prefer me taking the 3 
"ARM: dts: foo" patches, while the rest would go through your tree.

Main reason is to prevent any possible conflicts with other Rockchip 
devicetree additions also going into 4.6 .


Thanks
Heiko

> > - ARM: dts: Add arm, pl330-broken-no-flushp quirk for rk3288 platform
> > - ARM: dts: Add arm, pl330-broken-no-flushp quirk for rk3xxx platform
> > - ARM: dts: add pl330-broken-no-flushp quirk for rk3036 SoCs
> > 
> > Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
> 
> Thanks