linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] ARM64: dts: rockchip: Add GMAC to GeekBox

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 8 Feb 2016 11:40:15 +0100
From:	Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
To:	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc:	linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] ARM64: dts: rockchip: Add GMAC to GeekBox

Hi Heiko,

Am 08.02.2016 um 11:28 schrieb Heiko Stuebner:
> Am Montag, 8. Februar 2016, 03:17:33 schrieb Andreas Färber:
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
> 
> is there some special reason that gmac, emmc, ir, etc are in separate 
> patches? I guess I'll just fold them into the core patch otherwise.

Yes, feel free to squash. They are separate because they were not in v1,
it makes them easier to review and I didn't want errors in them to hold
up the base .dts. :) For example, SDIO I am still fighting with.

Cheers,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)