lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:52:22 +0000
From:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To:	Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<xen-devel@...ts.xen.org>, <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	<boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
CC:	<stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] xen/scsiback: avoid warnings when
 adding multiple LUNs to a domain

On 08/02/16 16:50, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 08/02/16 17:46, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 08/02/16 14:30, Juergen Gross wrote:
>>> When adding more than one LUN to a frontend a warning for a failed
>>> assignment is issued in dom0 for each already existing LUN. Avoid this
>>> warning by checking for a LUN already existing when existence is
>>> allowed (scsiback_do_add_lun() called with try == 1).
>>>
>>> As the LUN existence check is needed now for a third time, factor it
>>> out into a function. This in turn leads to a more or less complete
>>> rewrite of scsiback_del_translation_entry() which will now return a
>>> proper error code in case of failure.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
>>> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
>>
>> Avoiding warnings doesn't seem like a viable candidate for stable.  Is
>> there more to this patch than the description suggests?
> 
> No.
> 
> Should I resend without the Cc: stable?

No, I've dropped it.

I've applied these two to for-linus-4.5, thanks.

David

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ