linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V6 1/6] regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before removing domain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 9 Feb 2016 20:35:45 +0530
From:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
CC:	<lee.jones@...aro.org>, <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
	<k.kozlowski@...sung.com>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	<a.zummo@...ertech.it>, <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 1/6] regmap: irq: dispose all virtual irq before removing
 domain


On Tuesday 09 February 2016 08:44 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 10:27:22AM -0300, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>
>> I believe this patch could be picked separately and not made part of
>> this series since is fixing a bug that happens on most drivers using
>> the regmap-irq API. This will avoid cross-subsystem churn for people.
> Yes, please don't mix things in when there are no dependencies.
>

Do I need to resend the patches on which 1/6 is not in series?