lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:39:36 -0800 From: Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org> Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks Hi Rafael, On 02/08/2016 03:06 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Now that all review comments have been addressed in patch [3/3], I'm going to > put this series into linux-next. > > There already is 20+ patches on top of it in the queue including fixes for > bugs that have haunted us for quite some time (and that functionally depend on > this set) and I'd really like all that to get enough linux-next coverage, so > there really isn't more time to wait. Sorry for the late reply. As Juri mentioned I was OOO last week and really just got to look at this today. One concern I had was, given that the lone scheduler update hook is in CFS, is it possible for governor updates to be stalled due to RT or DL task activity? thanks, Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists