lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 12 Feb 2016 10:10:23 -0800
From:	Andrew Duggan <aduggan@...aptics.com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
CC:	Linux Input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
	Christopher Heiny <cheiny@...aptics.com>,
	Stephen Chandler Paul <cpaul@...hat.com>,
	Vincent Huang <vincent.huang@...synaptics.com>,
	Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>,
	Andrey Gusakov <andrey.gusakov@...entembedded.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] Input: synaptics-rmi4: Synaptics RMI4 Driver

On 02/12/2016 04:54 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:23 PM, Andrew Duggan <aduggan@...aptics.com> wrote:
>
>> This is the v5 patch series which fixes the issues identified by kbuild
>> and coccinelle in the previous patch series. These include:
>>
>> - Using ARRAY_SIZE instead of a custom macro to calculate the size of the
>>    function handler array.
>> - Remove setting the .owner field for the driver in rmi_i2c and rmi_spi
>>    since the i2c-core and spi set that field.
>> - Fix if statment in rmi_f30 which was testing has_led twice instead of
>>    testing has_gpio.
> Works like a charm.
> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

Thanks for testing. At this point except for the touchscreen binding 
rename fix needed in patch 5, all of the outstanding issues have been 
addressed. If the rest of the patch series is acceptable, then I can do 
a final v6 respin which fixes the binding and also removes the HID 
patch. But, if more work needs to be done on the patch series I can wait 
to do the respin. Dmitry, what do you think of the patch series at this 
point?

Thanks,
Andrew

> Yours,
> Linus Walleij

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ