linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "ASoC: qcom: Specify LE device endianness"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 12 Feb 2016 21:35:26 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	Kenneth Westfield <kwestfie@...eaurora.org>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "ASoC: qcom: Specify LE device endianness"

On Friday 12 February 2016 20:03:11 Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 08:48:58PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
> > which all look like they are regmap_mmio users as well. Do they 
> > suffer from the same problem?
> 
> Probably, yes.  It's only a problem if they're in systems that might
> otherwise run big endian successfully.
> 

The affected clock drivers seem to include all the qcom platforms,
so I assumed that whatever platform uses sound/soc/qcom/lpass-cpu.c
has to use one of those as well. Same thing for drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c.

lpc32xx probably won't support big-endian.

syscon is probably fine because it only sets that flag based on the
"little-endian" DT property and I don't see anything setting that
(except the one platform that did so incorrectly).

	Arnd