Date:	Sun, 14 Feb 2016 11:02:47 +0530
From:	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
	paulus@...ba.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [V3] powerpc/mm: Fix Multi hit ERAT cause by recent THP update

Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> writes:

> On Tue, 2016-09-02 at 01:20:31 UTC, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" wrote:
>> With ppc64 we use the deposited pgtable_t to store the hash pte slot
>> information. We should not withdraw the deposited pgtable_t without
>> marking the pmd none. This ensure that low level hash fault handling
>> will skip this huge pte and we will handle them at upper levels.
>> 
>> Recent change to pmd splitting changed the above in order to handle the
>> race between pmd split and exit_mmap. The race is explained below.
>> 
>> Consider following race:
>> 
>> 		CPU0				CPU1
>> shrink_page_list()
>>   add_to_swap()
>>     split_huge_page_to_list()
>>       __split_huge_pmd_locked()
>>         pmdp_huge_clear_flush_notify()
>> 	// pmd_none() == true
>> 					exit_mmap()
>> 					  unmap_vmas()
>> 					    zap_pmd_range()
>> 					      // no action on pmd since pmd_none() == true
>> 	pmd_populate()
>> 
>> As result the THP will not be freed. The leak is detected by check_mm():
>> 
>> 	BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:ffff880058d2e580 idx:1 val:512
>> 
>> The above required us to not mark pmd none during a pmd split.
>> 
>> The fix for ppc is to clear the huge pte of _PAGE_USER, so that low
>> level fault handling code skip this pte. At higher level we do take ptl
>> lock. That should serialze us against the pmd split. Once the lock is
>> acquired we do check the pmd again using pmd_same. That should always
>> return false for us and hence we should retry the access. We do the
>> pmd_same check in all case after taking plt with
>> THP (do_huge_pmd_wp_page, do_huge_pmd_numa_page and
>> huge_pmd_set_accessed)
>> 
>> Also make sure we wait for irq disable section in other cpus to finish
>> before flipping a huge pte entry with a regular pmd entry. Code paths
>> like find_linux_pte_or_hugepte depend on irq disable to get
>> a stable pte_t pointer. A parallel thp split need to make sure we
>> don't convert a pmd pte to a regular pmd entry without waiting for the
>> irq disable section to finish.
>> 
>> Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Applied to powerpc fixes, thanks.
>
> https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/9db4cd6c21535a4846b38808f3
>

Can we apply the below hunk ?. The reason for marking pmd none was to
avoid clearing both _PAGE_USER and _PAGE_PRESENT on the pte. At pmd
level that used to mean a hugepd pointer before. We did fix that earlier
by introducing _PAGE_PTE. But then I was thinking it was harmless to
mark pmd none. Now marking it one will still result in the race I
explained above, eventhough the window is much smaller now.

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable_64.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable_64.c
index c8a00da39969..03f6e72697d0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable_64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable_64.c
@@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ void set_pmd_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
 void pmdp_invalidate(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
 		     pmd_t *pmdp)
 {
-	pmd_hugepage_update(vma->vm_mm, address, pmdp, ~0UL, 0);
+	pmd_hugepage_update(vma->vm_mm, address, pmdp, _PAGE_PRESENT, 0);
 	/*
 	 * This ensures that generic code that rely on IRQ disabling
 	 * to prevent a parallel THP split work as expected.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists