lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 14 Feb 2016 14:20:27 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.3 020/200] remoteproc: avoid stack overflow in debugfs file

4.3-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

commit 92792e48e2ae6051af30468a87994b5432da2f06 upstream.

Recent gcc versions warn about reading from a negative offset of
an on-stack array:

drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c: In function 'rproc_recovery_write':
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c:167:9: warning: 'buf[4294967295u]' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]

I don't see anything in sys_write() that prevents us from
being called with a zero 'count' argument, so we should
add an extra check in rproc_recovery_write() to prevent the
access and avoid the warning.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Fixes: 2e37abb89a2e ("remoteproc: create a 'recovery' debugfs entry")
Signed-off-by: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ rproc_recovery_write(struct file *filp,
 	char buf[10];
 	int ret;
 
-	if (count > sizeof(buf))
+	if (count < 1 || count > sizeof(buf))
 		return count;
 
 	ret = copy_from_user(buf, user_buf, count);


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ