linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] netfilter: fix IS_ERR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 17 Feb 2016 02:31:27 +0000
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>,
	Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@....inr.ac.ru>,
	James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] netfilter: fix IS_ERR_VALUE usage

On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 03:35:19PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> IS_ERR_VALUE should be used only with unsigned long type.
> Otherwise it can work incorrectly. To achieve this function
> xt_percpu_counter_alloc is modified to return unsigned long,
> and its result is assigned to temporary variable to perform
> error checking, before assigning to .pcnt field.

	Wrong fix, IMO.  Just have an anon union of u64 pcnt and
struct xt_counters __percpu *pcpu in there.  And make this

> +static inline unsigned long xt_percpu_counter_alloc(void)
>  {
>  	if (nr_cpu_ids > 1) {
>  		void __percpu *res = __alloc_percpu(sizeof(struct xt_counters),
>  						    sizeof(struct xt_counters));
>  
>  		if (res == NULL)
> -			return (u64) -ENOMEM;
> +			return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -		return (u64) (__force unsigned long) res;
> +		return (__force unsigned long) res;
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;

take struct xt_counters * and return 0 or -ENOMEM.  Storing the result of
allocation in ->pcpu of passed structure.

I mean, look at the callers -

> -	e->counters.pcnt = xt_percpu_counter_alloc();
> -	if (IS_ERR_VALUE(e->counters.pcnt))
> +	pcnt = xt_percpu_counter_alloc();
> +	if (IS_ERR_VALUE(pcnt))
>  		return -ENOMEM;
> +	e->counters.pcnt = pcnt;

should be
	if (xt_percpu_counter_alloc(&e->counters) < 0)
		return -ENOMEM;

and similar for the rest of callers.  Moreover, if you look at the _users_
of that fields, you'll see that a bunch of those actually want to use
->pcpu instead of doing all those casts.

Really, that's the point - IS_ERR_VALUE is a big red flag saying "we need
to figure out what's going on in that place", which does include reading
through the code.  Mechanical "solutions" like that only hide the problem.