linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Revert "regulator: tps65217: remove tps65217.dtsi file"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:53:03 +0900
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Heiko Schocher <hs@...x.de>
Cc:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>, j-keerthy@...com,
	robh@...nel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "regulator: tps65217: remove tps65217.dtsi file"

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 10:27:49AM +0100, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Am 19.02.2016 um 18:04 schrieb Tony Lindgren:
> >* Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com> [160219 06:14]:

> >I'll apply this revert into omap-for-v4.5/fixes as it fixes a
> >regression.

> Sorry for breaking ... but I have no bbw hw for testing ...
> (This is maybe a reason for having something like an automated
>  testsystem, see an example/proposal here:

Or sending boards to kernelci.org for that matter.

> But I removed this file as Mark Brown suggested it, see:

> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/21/581

> So please introduce a "tps65217-am335x.dtsi" file ... Mark?

This is an OMAP DTS file, it needs the OMAP people to work on it - DT
updates don't go through the driver trees usually.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)