lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 26 Feb 2016 06:29:23 +0800
From:	Chen Gang <chengang@...ndsoft.com.cn>
To:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
CC:	trivial@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, vbabka@...e.cz,
	rientjes@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mhocko@...e.cz,
	hannes@...xchg.org, vdavydov@...tuozzo.com,
	dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH trivial] include/linux/gfp.h: Improve the coding styles

On 2/26/16 00:07, Mel Gorman wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 06:26:31AM +0800, chengang@...ndsoft.com.cn wrote:
> 
> I do not want this patch to go through the trivial tree. It still adds
> another step to identifying relevant commits through git blame and has
> limited, if any, benefit to maintainability.
> 
>>   "it's preferable to preserve blame than go through a layer of cleanup
>>   when looking for the commit that defined particular flags".
>>
> 
> git blame identifies what commit last altered a line. If a cleanup patch
> is encountered then the tree before that commit needs to be examined
> which adds time. It's rare that cleanup patches on their own are useful
> and this is one of those cases.
> 

git is a tool mainly for analyzing code, but not mainly for normal
reading main code.

So for me, the coding styles need not consider about git.


Thanks.
-- 
Chen Gang (陈刚)

Managing Natural Environments is the Duty of Human Beings.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ