lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 26 Feb 2016 12:43:13 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	nbd@...nwrt.org
Cc:	andrew@...n.ch, blogic@...nwrt.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	matthias.bgg@...il.com, steven.liu@...iatek.com,
	Carlos.Huang@...iatek.com, Fred.Chang@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 03/12] net-next: mediatek: add embedded switch
 driver (ESW)

From: Felix Fietkau <nbd@...nwrt.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 17:25:38 +0100

> In my opinion, leaving this part out does not make much sense and
> neither does deferring the entire patch series until we have a
> switchdev/DSA capable driver. This is just a starting point, which will
> be turned into a proper driver with the right APIs later.

I disagree, and we want people to concentrate on writing proper
switchdev/DSA drivers.

People like Andrew have offered to help in any way possible to make
this as easy as possible, so please take this seriously.

I would have accepted your arguments a year ago when we didn't have
the right infrastructure, but now we do and there is no real excuse
to submit partial or bastardized drivers for these kinds of hardware
anymore

Thanks in advance for your understanding, and I'm plan to stand
very firm on this.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ