lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 27 Feb 2016 12:55:46 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc:	Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@...il.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] x86/setup: get ramdisk parameters only once


* Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de> wrote:

> >  void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> >  {
> > +	struct ramdisk ramdisk = {
> > +		.start_addr = get_ramdisk_image(),
> > +		.size  = PAGE_ALIGN(get_ramdisk_size()),
> > +		.reserve_ramdisk = true
> > +	};
> 
> More readable:
> 
>         struct ramdisk ramdisk = {
>                 .start_addr	 = get_ramdisk_image(),
>                 .size		 = PAGE_ALIGN(get_ramdisk_size()),
>                 .reserve_ramdisk = true,
>         };

So I find it highly annoying that this review feedback was done by Boris, but not 
implemented in v8 :-(

I'd much have preferred fewer iterations and more careful implementation, which 
would have resulted in much less time wasted on the reviewer side...

Anyway, to stop this trainwreck I've fixed this (and a few other small details) 
and applied the patch, but I'd also like to point out that from now on I'll stop 
accepting trivial patches from serial trivial patches contributors that are not 
part of some larger, more substantial work...

Thanks,

	Ingo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ