linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH trivial] include/linux/gfp.h: Improve the coding styles

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 27 Feb 2016 11:53:01 -0500
From:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Chen Gang <chengang@...ndsoft.com.cn>
Cc:	Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@...il.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>, trivial@...nel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, rientjes@...gle.com,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, vdavydov@...tuozzo.com,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH trivial] include/linux/gfp.h: Improve the coding styles

On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 10:32:04PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> I don't think so. Of cause NOT the "CODE CHURN". It is not correct to
> make an early decision during discussing.

There is no discussion.  If the maintainer has NAK'ed it.  That's the
end of the dicsussion.  Period.  See:

ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/trivial/template-index.html

Also note the comment from the above:

   NOTE: This means I'll only take whitespace/indentation fixes from the
   author or maintainer.

      	   	      	   			       	     - Ted