lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 2 Mar 2016 17:21:39 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@....com>
Cc:	tony.luck@...el.com, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, dougthompson@...ssion.com,
	mchehab@....samsung.com, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	ashok.raj@...el.com, gong.chen@...ux.intel.com,
	len.brown@...el.com, peterz@...radead.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
	alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/mce/AMD, EDAC: Simplify SMCA decoding

On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 09:52:23AM -0600, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
> So, I think we should continue this approach and have something like this-
> static const char * const amd_core_mcablock_names[] = {
>         [SMCA_LS]         = "load_store",
>         [SMCA_IF]         = "insn_fetch",
>         [SMCA_L2_CACHE]   = "l2_cache",
>         [SMCA_DE]         = "decode_unit",
>         [RES]                   = "",
>         [SMCA_EX]         = "execution_unit",
>         [SMCA_FP]         = "floating_point",
>         [SMCA_L3_CACHE]   = "l3_cache",
> };
> 
> static const char * const amd_df_mcablock_names[] = {
>         [SMCA_CS]  = "coherent_slave",
>         [SMCA_PIE] = "pie",
> };
> 
> (Split arrays again because I feel it'd be better to have arrays ordered
> according to mca_type values)

Ok, care to take the patch and redo it as you suggest?

I really don't want to be assigning strings each time during decoding.

Also, make sure the strings are as human readable as possible and so
that users can at least have an idea what we're saying. "load_store"
is better than "LS", "insn_fetch" is better than "IF", etc. Some
abbreviations should remain, though. "platform_security_processor" is
yucky and I guess there we can stick to "PSP". Ditto for "SMU"...

Making the unabbreviated lowercase for sysfs usage is fine too, of
course.

Thanks.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ