lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 2 Mar 2016 17:55:16 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...tfour.com>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] x86: Make sure verify_cpu has a good stack

On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 06:38:15PM +0200, Mika Penttilä wrote:
> I actually looked at it a while too...
> 
> The
>   movq stack_start - __START_KERNEL_map, %rsp
> 
> turns into (objdump disassembly)
> 
>   mov    0x0,%rsp
> 
> with relocation
> 0000000000000004 R_X86_64_32S      stack_start+0x0000000080000000
> 
> Now stack_start is at ffffffff81ef3380, so the relocation gives 1ef3380 which would be correct, so why the
> second subq ?
> 
> You may explain :)

Here it is :-)

$ readelf -a vmlinux | grep stack_start
 70526: ffffffff81cbabf8     0 NOTYPE  GLOBAL DEFAULT   14 stack_start

0xffffffff81cbabf8 - __START_KERNEL_map =
0xffffffff81cbabf8 - 0xffffffff80000000 =
0x1cbabf8

(gdb) x/x 0x1cbabf8
0x1cbabf8:      0xffffffff81c03ff8

(You don't need gdb for that - you can hexdump or objdump vmlinux).

Now stack_start is:

        GLOBAL(stack_start)
        .quad  init_thread_union+THREAD_SIZE-8

which is

$ readelf -a vmlinux | grep init_thread_union
 82491: ffffffff81c00000 16384 OBJECT  GLOBAL DEFAULT   14 init_thread_union

so init_thread_union+THREAD_SIZE-8 = 0xffffffff81c00000 + 4*4096-8 = 0xffffffff81c03ff8

So you have to subtract __START_KERNEL_map again because it has there a
virtual address and we haven't enabled paging yet:

0xffffffff81c03ff8 - 0xffffffff80000000 = 0x1c03ff8.

Makes sense?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ