linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] cpufreq: governor: Move abstract gov

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 3 Mar 2016 11:33:21 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
	Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] cpufreq: governor: Move abstract gov_tunables code
 to a seperate file

On 02-03-16, 03:10, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> 
> Move abstract code related to struct gov_tunables to a separate (new)
> file so it can be shared with (future) goverernors that won't share
> more code with "ondemand" and "conservative".
> 
> No intentional functional changes.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig                     |    4 +
>  drivers/cpufreq/Makefile                    |    1 
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.c          |   82 ---------------------------
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor.h          |    6 ++
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_governor_tunables.c |   84 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

These aren't governor tunables, isn't it? Tunables were the fields
that could be tuned, but this is something else.

-- 
viresh