lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 3 Mar 2016 08:17:14 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>
Cc:	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
	Daniel Stone <daniels@...labora.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
	Riley Andrews <riandrews@...roid.com>,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
	Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@...gle.com>,
	Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.co.uk>,
	John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/android: add flags member to sync ioctl structs

On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 11:37:17AM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.co.uk>
> 
> Play safe and add flags member to all structs. So we don't need to
> break API or create new IOCTL in the future if new features that requires
> flags arises.
> 
> v2: check if flags are valid (zero, in this case)
> 
> v3: return -EINVAL if flags are not zero'ed
> 
> v4: add padding for 64-bit alignment
> 
> v5: rebase to use only stacked sync_file_info

Why are these vX things here in the changelog?

And you just broke all existing userspace users of this code, why are
you allowed to do that?

not ok...

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ