lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 3 Mar 2016 08:33:37 -0800
From:	David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
To:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC:	David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gkulkarni@...iumnetworks.com>,
	Robert Richter <rrichter@...ium.com>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 4/6] arm64: Move unflatten_device_tree() call earlier.

On 03/03/2016 05:47 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 4:56 PM, David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com> wrote:
>> From: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
>>
>> In order to extract NUMA information from the device tree, we need to
>> have the tree in its unflattened form.
>>
>> Move the call to unflatten_device_tree() into paging_init().  This
>> puts it before the call to bootmem_init(), which is where the NUMA
>> information is extracted.
>
> Can't you just move up unflatten_device_tree in setup_arch rather than
> hiding in paging_init?

No.

It must come *after* map_mem() and *before* bootmem_init(), both of 
which are done within paging_init().

One option would be to split the things in paging_init() into two 
functions, and then do:

.
.
.
    paging_init_first_part();
    if (acpi_disabled)
        unflatten_device_tree();
    paging_init_second_part();
.
.
.

>
>> Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/kernel/setup.c | 7 +++----
>>   arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c       | 5 +++++
>>   2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ