[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 20:39:02 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] cpufreq: Support for fast frequency switching
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:12:33AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> +void cpufreq_driver_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>> + unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int relation)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int freq;
>> +
>> + if (target_freq == policy->cur)
>> + return;
>
> But what if relation is different from last time? ;-)
Doh
Never mind, I'll drop this check (that said this mistake is present
elsewhere too IIRC).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists