linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] Shared library support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 7 Mar 2016 13:05:16 -0800
From:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:	Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kbuild <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
	PaX Team <pageexec@...email.hu>,
	Brad Spengler <spender@...ecurity.net>,
	"kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com" 
	<kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
	Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] Shared library support

On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com> wrote:
> Infrastructure for building independent shared library targets.
> This effectively also reverts commit 62e2210798ed38928ab24841e8b4878a
> (Masahiro Yamada, kbuild: drop shared library support from Makefile.host).

Should this literally be a revert? If so, we'd gain the Documentation
changes back too.

-Kees

>
> Signed-off-by: Emese Revfy <re.emese@...il.com>
> ---
>  scripts/Makefile.build |  2 +-
>  scripts/Makefile.clean |  3 ++-
>  scripts/Makefile.host  | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS & Brillo Security