lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 8 Mar 2016 18:24:25 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Wang Nan <wangnan0@...wei.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	He Kuang <hekuang@...wei.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@...il.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
	Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>, pi3orama@....com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/5] perf core: Support overwrite ring buffer


* Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> >> It only had a couple of seconds of runtime:
> >>
> >>  49652 mingo     20   0 1434276  52144  11344 S   0.0  0.0   0:00.54 syz-manager
> >>  49661 mingo     20   0 2196672  43948  10448 S   0.0  0.0   0:05.59 syz-fuzzer
> >
> > Ah, so it appears to making some progress:
> >
> >  49652 mingo     20   0 1581740  47600  11344 S   0.0  0.0   0:00.58 syz-manager
> >  49661 mingo     20   0 2204868  43720  10448 S   0.0  0.0   0:07.49 syz-fuzzer
> >
> >  49652 mingo     20   0 1598132  31512  11344 S   0.0  0.0   0:00.61 syz-manager
> >  49661 mingo     20   0 2204868  44252  10448 S   0.0  0.0   0:09.09 syz-fuzzer
> >
> > but only about +1 second runtime added every minute or so. Is that expected?
> 
> The main work is done by child syz-executor processes.

Hm, they don't seem to be doing anything:

fomalhaut:~> ps aux | grep syz-executor
mingo     41506  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:19   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     41509  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:19   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     41513  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:19   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     41515  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:19   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     41523  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:19   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     41601  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:19   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     41608  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:19   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     41662  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:19   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     41764  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:19   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     41966  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:19   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     42029  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:19   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     42084  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:19   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     42145  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:19   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     42149  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:19   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     42166  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:19   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     42175  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:19   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     57627  2.2  0.0 1860540 44884 pts/2   Sl+  18:16   0:04 /home/mingo/go/src/github.com/google/syzkaller/workdir/instance-0/syz-fuzzer -executor /home/mingo/go/src/github.com/google/syzkaller/workdir/instance-0/syz-executor -name local-0 -manager 127.0.0.1:33809 -output=none -procs 16 -leak=false -cover=false -nobody=true -v 0

... because they are recycling:

fomalhaut:~> ps aux | grep syz-executor
mingo     57627  1.6  0.0 1942468 44624 pts/2   Sl+  18:16   0:05 /home/mingo/go/src/github.com/google/syzkaller/workdir/instance-0/syz-fuzzer -executor /home/mingo/go/src/github.com/google/syzkaller/workdir/instance-0/syz-executor -name local-0 -manager 127.0.0.1:33809 -output=none -procs 16 -leak=false -cover=false -nobody=true -v 0
mingo     98448  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:21   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     98454  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:21   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     98468  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:21   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     98472  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:21   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     98476  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:21   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     98522  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:21   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     98525  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:21   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     98548  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:21   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     98568  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:21   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     98596  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:21   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     98618  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:21   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     98644  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:21   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     98695  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:21   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     98708  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:21   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     98737  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:21   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>
mingo     98756  0.0  0.0      0     0 pts/2    Z+   18:21   0:00 [syz-executor] <defunct>

I'm not seeing anything happen in 'top' - only a mostly idle system.

> syz-manager/syz-fuzzer only guide the process.
> You can set "procs" param in config to higher value to increase CPU
> utilization. To get more bugs you want to saturate all CPUs to trigger
> more unusual thread interleavings.

So right now it doesn't seem to saturate 16 CPUs - not even close to it.

> If there is a second unfinished thread hanging on a kernel spinlock or
> mutex, then it's definitely bad.
> It also helps to enable CONFIG_RCU_STALL_COMMON=y,
> CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y, CONFIG_WQ_WATCHDOG=y and spinlock/mutex
> debugging. These can detect various stalls.

I can just Ctrl-C the manager and it shuts down within a few seconds:

2016/03/08 17:39:25 serving rpc on tcp://127.0.0.1:33809
2016/03/08 17:51:45 local-0: lost connection: exit status 2
2016/03/08 17:51:45 local-0: saving crash 'lost connection' to crash-local-0-1457455905403390570
2016/03/08 18:04:04 local-0: lost connection: exit status 2
2016/03/08 18:04:04 local-0: saving crash 'lost connection' to crash-local-0-1457456644779165131
2016/03/08 18:16:24 local-0: lost connection: exit status 2
2016/03/08 18:16:24 local-0: saving crash 'lost connection' to crash-local-0-1457457384707190124
^C2016/03/08 18:22:53 shutting down...

with nothing hanging around:

fomalhaut:~/go/src/github.com/google/syzkaller> ps aux | grep -i syz
mingo      1374  0.0  0.0 118476  2376 pts/2    S+   18:23   0:00 grep --color=auto -i syz

and with no kernel messages in dmesg - and with a fully functional system.

I'm running the 16-task load on a 120 CPU system - should I increase it to 120? 
Does the code expect to saturate the system?

Thanks,

	Ingo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ