lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 19:45:04 -0500 From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org> To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org> Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, timur@...eaurora.org, cov@...eaurora.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, ravikanth.nalla@....com, lenb@...nel.org, harish.k@....com, ashwin.reghunandanan@....com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] acpi, pci, irq: account for early penalty assignment Hi Bjorn, On 3/8/2016 2:04 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote: >>> The point here is that a PCI Interrupt Link can only use an IRQ that >>> >> is level-triggered, active low. If an IRQ is already set to any other >>> >> state, whether for an ISA device or for an active-high SCI, we can't >>> >> use it for a PCI Interrupt Link. > Unfortunately, this still doesn't hold. > > A patch is long overdue for this series. I'll post v3. We can go from there. I just posted a new series and changed the title. Let's continue the discussion there. [PATCH 1/4] acpi,pci,irq: reduce resource requirements ... -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists