linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 1/5] doc/memory-barriers: fix missed renaming: s/lock/acquire

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 11 Mar 2016 00:06:56 +0900
From:	SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>
To:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, corbet@....net, minchan@...nel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/5] doc/memory-barriers: fix missed renaming: s/lock/acquire

Terms `lock` and `unlock` have changed to `acquire` / `release` by
commit 2e4f5382d12a441b5cccfdde00308df15c2ce300 ("locking/doc: Rename
LOCK/UNLOCK to ACQUIRE/RELEASE").  However, the commit missed to change
the table of content.  This commit changes the missed parts.
Also, section name `Acquiring functions` is not appropriate for the
section because the section is saying about lock in actual.  This commit
changes the name to more appropriate name, `Lock acquisition functions`.

Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj38.park@...il.com>
Suggested-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
---
 Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
index 3729cbe..530fae6 100644
--- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
@@ -31,15 +31,15 @@ Contents:
 
  (*) Implicit kernel memory barriers.
 
-     - Locking functions.
+     - Lock acquisition functions.
      - Interrupt disabling functions.
      - Sleep and wake-up functions.
      - Miscellaneous functions.
 
- (*) Inter-CPU locking barrier effects.
+ (*) Inter-CPU acquiring barrier effects.
 
-     - Locks vs memory accesses.
-     - Locks vs I/O accesses.
+     - Acquires vs memory accesses.
+     - Acquires vs I/O accesses.
 
  (*) Where are memory barriers needed?
 
@@ -1858,7 +1858,7 @@ This is a variation on the mandatory write barrier that causes writes to weakly
 ordered I/O regions to be partially ordered.  Its effects may go beyond the
 CPU->Hardware interface and actually affect the hardware at some level.
 
-See the subsection "Locks vs I/O accesses" for more information.
+See the subsection "Acquires vs I/O accesses" for more information.
 
 
 ===============================
@@ -1873,8 +1873,8 @@ provide more substantial guarantees, but these may not be relied upon outside
 of arch specific code.
 
 
-ACQUIRING FUNCTIONS
--------------------
+LOCK ACQUISITION FUNCTIONS
+--------------------------
 
 The Linux kernel has a number of locking constructs:
 
-- 
1.9.1