lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 16 Mar 2016 19:33:16 +0800
From:	Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@...il.com>
To:	pbonzini@...hat.com
Cc:	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@...il.com>,
	Gavin Guo <gavin.guo@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: x86: optimize steal time calculation

Since accumulate_steal_time is now only called in record_steal_time, it
doesn't quite make sense to put the delta calculation in a separate
function. The function could be called thousands of times before guest
enables the steal time MSR (though the compiler may optimize out this
function call). And after it's enabled, the MSR enable bit is tested twice
every time. Removing the accumulate_steal_time function also avoids the
necessity of having the accum_steal field.

Signed-off-by: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Gavin Guo <gavin.guo@...onical.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  1 -
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c              | 19 +++----------------
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 44adbb8..3f460a7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -547,7 +547,6 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
 	struct {
 		u64 msr_val;
 		u64 last_steal;
-		u64 accum_steal;
 		struct gfn_to_hva_cache stime;
 		struct kvm_steal_time steal;
 	} st;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index eaf6ee8..82bfefc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -2002,22 +2002,8 @@ static void kvmclock_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	vcpu->arch.pv_time_enabled = false;
 }
 
-static void accumulate_steal_time(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
-{
-	u64 delta;
-
-	if (!(vcpu->arch.st.msr_val & KVM_MSR_ENABLED))
-		return;
-
-	delta = current->sched_info.run_delay - vcpu->arch.st.last_steal;
-	vcpu->arch.st.last_steal = current->sched_info.run_delay;
-	vcpu->arch.st.accum_steal = delta;
-}
-
 static void record_steal_time(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
-	accumulate_steal_time(vcpu);
-
 	if (!(vcpu->arch.st.msr_val & KVM_MSR_ENABLED))
 		return;
 
@@ -2025,9 +2011,10 @@ static void record_steal_time(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 		&vcpu->arch.st.steal, sizeof(struct kvm_steal_time))))
 		return;
 
-	vcpu->arch.st.steal.steal += vcpu->arch.st.accum_steal;
+	vcpu->arch.st.steal.steal += current->sched_info.run_delay -
+		vcpu->arch.st.last_steal;
+	vcpu->arch.st.last_steal = current->sched_info.run_delay;
 	vcpu->arch.st.steal.version += 2;
-	vcpu->arch.st.accum_steal = 0;
 
 	kvm_write_guest_cached(vcpu->kvm, &vcpu->arch.st.stime,
 		&vcpu->arch.st.steal, sizeof(struct kvm_steal_time));
-- 
1.9.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ