linux-kernel - Re: [RFT] iommu/amd: use subsys

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:57:47 +0100
From:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To:	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
	Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@...il.com>,
	iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT] iommu/amd: use subsys_initcall() on amdv2 iommu

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 05:39:00PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 05:17:37PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:16:57PM +0200, Oded Gabbay wrote:
> > > In theory it should, but I would prefer that it would be tested on
> > > actual hardware.
> > 
> > Hence, RFT. Anyone have hardware to test ? And would the other hack
> > mentioned need to be reverted first ?
> 
> Yes, the other hack needs to be reverted first to see if this one helps.

I'm afraid I am not sure where that hack is, can someone construct a patch to
revert that so this is a proper RFT series ?

  Luis