linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: uniphier: UniPhier updates for Linux 4.6-rc1 (2nd round)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 21 Mar 2016 20:33:21 +0100
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, arm@...nel.org,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: uniphier: UniPhier updates for Linux 4.6-rc1 (2nd round)

On Monday 21 March 2016 21:39:31 Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
> 
> 2016-03-21 18:49 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>:
> > On Monday 21 March 2016 12:59:20 Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> >>
> >> I thought you'd include DT updates in the pull requests,
> >> but you didn't.
> >>
> >> Why was next/dt2 missed?
> >
> > This is the branch that I pulled in some patches last, I'm going to send
> > it in a couple of days, after it has been in linux-next. It should be there
> > in the end.
> 
> I did not know this.
> That'll be great.
> 
> Sorry for poking you again and again.

Nothing wrong on your end. Generally it's a good idea to remind us if you
send patches and nothing happens after a week, or you are unsure whether
we actually did what we said we'd do (as in this case).

I should really have been clearer in the pull request message about the
fact that there is still some part missing.

	Arnd