linux-kernel - Re: Livepatch consistency model update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:41:52 -0500
From:	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
To:	Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc:	Jessica Yu <jeyu@...hat.com>, Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Livepatch consistency model update

On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 11:32:34PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> 
> > The objtool stack validation patches have been merged into Linus's tree
> > for 4.6 with commit 26660a4046b1, and all known warnings are fixed.  
> 
> Yup, I've noticed earlier today, this is just excellent! (except for the 
> name, but well, what can we do :-) ). Thanks a lot for all the efforts 
> you've invested into this.

Thanks :-)  I was so relieved to see it finally merged!

> > So I'll be posting a revamped RFC of the hybrid consistency model 
> > patches soon.  The code isn't quite ready, and I'll be on vacation next 
> > week, so it'll probably be either later this week, or the week after 
> > next.
> 
> No matter how immature the code might be, it'd be great if you could 
> repost it still before leaving for your vacation, so that we could start 
> working on it on our side as well without unnecessary delays.

Sure, I'll dump what I have by the end of the week.

-- 
Josh