lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 22 Mar 2016 11:24:39 +1100
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...el.com>,
	Janani Ravichandran <janani.rvchndrn@...il.com>,
	Amitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1606@...il.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the rdma tree with Linus' tree

Hi Doug,

Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got conflicts in:

  drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/keys.c
  drivers/staging/rdma/hfi1/mr.c

between commits:

  809487c70388 ("staging: rdma: hfi1: Use DIV_ROUND_UP")
  037f741673e0 ("staging: rdma: hfi1: Do not use | with a variable with value 0")

from Linus' tree and commit:

  895420ddc8b3 ("staging/rdma/hfi1: Remove hfi1 MR and hfi1 specific qp type")

from the rdma tree.

I fixed it up (I just removed the 2 files - the changes from Linus'
tree may need to be applied to some other files, now) and can carry the
fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want
to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
minimise any particularly complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ