linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RT 4/6] rt/locking: Reenable migration accross schedule

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 25 Mar 2016 06:38:50 +0100
From:	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 4/6] rt/locking: Reenable migration accross schedule

On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 12:06 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-03-24 at 11:44 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >  
> > > On the bright side, with the busted migrate enable business reverted,
> > > plus one dinky change from me [1], master-rt.today has completed 100
> > > iterations of Steven's hotplug stress script along side endless
> > > futexstress, and is happily doing another 900 as I write this, so the
> > > next -rt should finally be hotplug deadlock free.
> > > 
> > > Thomas's state machinery seems to work wonders.  'course this being
> > > hotplug, the other shoe will likely apply itself to my backside soon.
> > 
> > That's a given :)
> 
> blk-mq applied it shortly after I was satisfied enough to poke xmit.

The other shoe is that notifiers can depend upon RCU grace periods, so
when pin_current_cpu() snags rcu_sched, the hotplug game is over.

blk_mq_queue_reinit_notify:
        /*
         * We need to freeze and reinit all existing queues.  Freezing
         * involves synchronous wait for an RCU grace period and doing it
         * one by one may take a long time.  Start freezing all queues in
         * one swoop and then wait for the completions so that freezing can
         * take place in parallel.
         */
        list_for_each_entry(q, &all_q_list, all_q_node)
                blk_mq_freeze_queue_start(q);
        list_for_each_entry(q, &all_q_list, all_q_node) {
                blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait(q);

Hohum (sharpens rock), next.

	-Mike