| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 01:14:01 -0400 From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com> To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@...h.uni-bielefeld.de>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: exynos_defconfig: Enable Samsung media platform drivers as modules Hello Krzysztof, On 03/28/2016 12:28 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 25.03.2016 12:15, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >>> >>> How about doing the same for multi_v7? >>> >> >> I didn't consider multi_v7 because media drivers aren't necessary for booting >> the boards and so it could increase build times for not real benefits in most >> machines. But I can enable it in multi_v7 as a follow-up if you think that it >> makes sense there too. > > I consider use cases of multi_v7 the same as exynos (except the > difference in policy: use always modules). This means that if it makes > sense to enable some media drivers on exynos (for build coverage, boot > testing and real usage) then it makes sense to do the same for multi_v7. > Ok, thanks a lot for your suggestion. I'll post a patch for multi_v7 then. > In ideal future we would move entirely from exynos-specific image to one > common image for testing: the multi_v7. It would make things simpler. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Open Source Group Samsung Research America
Powered by blists - more mailing lists