lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:37:32 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net> Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>, ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> Subject: Re: [Update][PATCH v7 6/7] cpufreq: Support for fast frequency switching On 30-03-16, 03:47, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c > @@ -843,6 +883,7 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct > pr_debug("acpi_cpufreq_cpu_exit\n"); > > if (data) { > + policy->fast_switch_possible = false; Is this done just for keeping code symmetric or is there a logical advantage of this? Just for my understanding, not saying that it is wrong. Otherwise, it looks good Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> -- viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists