lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 31 Mar 2016 10:28:09 +0200
From:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	Lakshmi Sai Krishna Potthuri 
	<lakshmi.sai.krishna.potthuri@...inx.com>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Michal Simek <michals@...inx.com>,
	Soren Brinkmann <sorenb@...inx.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
	"Andrew F. Davis" <afd@...com>, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
	Jagan Teki <jteki@...nedev.com>,
	Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
	"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-spi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-spi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Harini Katakam <harinik@...inx.com>,
	Punnaiah Choudary Kalluri <punnaia@...inx.com>,
	Anirudha Sarangi <anirudh@...inx.com>,
	"saikrishna12468@...il.com" <saikrishna12468@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [LINUX PATCH 1/2] mtd: Added dummy entry in the spi_transfer structure.

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Lakshmi Sai Krishna Potthuri
<lakshmi.sai.krishna.potthuri@...inx.com> wrote:
>>> >This is really not what I'd expect to happen, I'd expect that these dummy
>>> >cycles would be in addition to the actual data (see my request for better
>>> >documentation...).  If they overlap with the data then what is the point in
>>> >specifying this?  It's more work for the host, what benefit do we get from
>>> >doing it over just handing it like a normal byte?
>>
>>> len field in the transfer structure contains dummy bytes along with actual
>>data
>>> bytes, controllers which requires dummy bytes use len field and simply
>>Ignore
>>> the dummy field (contains only no of cycles)added in this patch. Controllers
>>> (like ZynqMP GQSPI) expects dummy in cycles won't work directly by using
>>> len field because host driver doesn't know that len field of a particular
>>transfer
>>> includes dummy bytes or not (and also number of dummy bytes included in
>>len
>>> field). In such cases driver use this dummy field to identify the number of
>>dummy
>>> cycles and based on that it will send the required number of dummy cycles
>>(which
>>> i did in the second patch).
>>
>>This doesn't make any sense at all to me.  Why does the controller care
>>what the bytes being sent to and from the device mean?
>
> From the flash point of view, it expects the controller to send the dummy
> on 1/2/4 lines based on the command. For Quad commands, flash expects
> 4 lines to be active during dummy phase. Similarly, 2 lines for dual
> Commands and 1 line for normal/fast commands.
> Since len field contains total number of cmd+addr+dummy bytes,
> host driver should take care of sending these bytes on their respective
> bus widths. Knowing when the dummy is being sent also helps in
> the correct switching of IO pads (since the data lines are bidirectional)
> ZynqMP GQSPI is a generic controller, majorly interfaced to flash devices.
> It seems reasonable for it to know the above information from
> the flash layer. Adding "dummy" cycles entry should be useful to any
> controller that cares about it without affecting other spi/qspi controllers.

The m25p80 driver already uses dummy cycles, using real spi_transfer
structs, which have tx_nbits/rx_nbits fields to indicate how many data lines
to use.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ