linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] libahci: save port map for forced port map

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:43:28 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, jmaggard10@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] libahci: save port map for forced port map

Hello,

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 04:58:27PM +0100, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> Yes, that is the intention, I guess, This was done exactly in case where the
> port number was fabricated too.
> 
> Without this I could not get the sata working on my board with forced port
> map option.

I see.  Looks good to me then.  Can you please respin the patches with
the updates for the review points in the second patch?  I'll apply
them to libata/for-3.6-fixes.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun