linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] vfs: constify arguments to utime family of system calls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 1 Apr 2016 04:30:06 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vfs: constify arguments to utime family of system
 calls

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 09:24:57PM -0500, Eric Biggers wrote:

> I feel it's a small improvement as it reduces the chance of bugs.  However, if
> you look at all the system calls, they are, in general, inconsistent about using
> 'const'.  So may be right that changing just a few isn't worthwhile.

It might very well be worth doing a full series, though - after all,
they are not hard to grep for ((COMPAT_)?SYSCALL_DEFINE[0-6] would get
you almost all of them, with rest consisting of weird shit in arch/*
that more often than not would be better off switched to SYSCALL_DEFINE).

The reason why it's worth doing completely or not at all is that partial
series will serve as an invitation to the alt.sex.masturbation.commit.count
crowd, with the usual quality of output...