[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2016 12:35:07 +0900
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To: "pankaj.dubey" <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kgene.kim@...sung.com, thomas.ab@...sung.com, olof@...om.net,
p.fedin@...sung.com, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESPIN 1/6] dt-bindings: EXYNOS: Add exynos-srom device tree
binding
On 05.03.2016 13:42, pankaj.dubey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wednesday 02 March 2016 11:23 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 02:03:37PM +0530, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>>> This patch adds exynos-srom binding information for SROM Controller
>>> driver on Exynos SoCs.
>>>
>>> CC: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
>>> CC: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
>>> CC: Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>
>>> CC: devicetree@...r.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@...sung.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt | 12 ++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..33886d5
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/exynos-srom.txt
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
>>> +SAMSUNG Exynos SoCs SROM Controller driver.
>>> +
>>> +Required properties:
>>> +- compatible : Should contain "samsung,exynos-srom".
>>
>> There should be SoC specific compatible strings in addition to this.
>>
>
> I do not understood need to additional need to SoC specific compatible,
> as of now all SoCs having SROM can work with exynos specific common
> compatible. Will you see any issues in this?
Dear Rob, Pankaj,
I would like to proceed with this patchset. I guess your comment here
was about to change the compatible from generic exynos-like to a model
specific. How about this:
- compatible : Should contain "samsung,exynos4210-srom".
Is this okay?
(the oldest chip mentioning SROM controller as separate block is Exynos4210)
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists